Archive for the 'Urban Philadelphia' Category

Out With the Ugly Infill

Snobbery isn’t a trait I find very attractive in many people, especially when it’s directed at superficial things like cars, house’s, school districts, and clothes.  And yet, I can’t help but take full ownership of my own snobbery regarding urban forms and how easy I believe it is to implement them properly.  It may be the snob in me, but I honestly believe developing and maintaining good urban forms is really a simple concept:

  • Step One – Open your eyes
  • Step Two – Take note of the streets, neighborhoods, and cities that attract investment, have strong sense of place characteristics, and are aesthetically pleasing
  • Step Three – Emulate them
  • Step Four – Done!

And yet, my recent move to the Northern Liberties neighborhood in Philadelphia has brought me back to reality and made me realize that maybe this isn’t such a simple concept and maybe my snobbery has clouded better judgment.  Essentially, my first impression is that the neighborhood has been inundated with urban infill that diminishes the great forms that already exist and therefore threaten the very reason the area has attracted so much investment to begin with.

To understand why this is happening in a place like Northern Liberties takes a bit of storytelling.  A long time ago, in the 1990’s, Philadelphia’s Center City started becoming extensively gentrified, modernized and no longer affordable to the masses.  As real estate prices increased, this effect began spilling out into surrounding neighborhoods, eventually landing in Northern Liberties just north of Old City.  Since the 1950’s, the neighborhood has seen its fair share of demolitions and neglect, leaving large swaths of land ripe for large-scale redevelopment.  This fact coupled with gentrification pressures moving into the neighborhood bore the fruit of large-scale urban infill development throughout Northern Liberties.

This is where the spotty infill comes into the story, a phenomenon that seemed to happen for three reasons:

  1. There wasn’t enough regulation or strong enough a Neighborhood Plan to enforce better infill standards from the onset
  2. The developer’s are likely not attuned to what types of forms make a great neighborhood
  3. The individual developer is more concerned with their bottom line than creating a cohesive neighborhood and thus uses ‘edgy’ materials and irregular building placements as a marketing tool to stand out in the crowd rather than fit in.

While I am sure individual developers have had immense profits from their developments throughout Northern Liberties, the collective neighborhood has been left with a number of issues, outlined in the series of images below:

Garage doors abound on ground floor residential streets, with no entrance articulation

Buildings are positioned at odd angles and do not provide cohesive urban building walls

Buildings ignore street corners

Cheap materials

Buildings don’t address public parks (this sits across the street from Northern Liberties premiere park)

Creates monotonous walls that don’t activate the ROW

Poor parking design

All of these examples, while individually annoying, collectively make for a bigger problem and create an urban realm that seems more like an odd patchwork collection of buildings than a unified district.  I am not calling for building or material monotony; I am simply stating the need for a more cohesive product that achieves a sustainable neighborhood worth caring about long-term.  My fear is that because a unified district is not being recreated in many Northern Liberties streets, overall sense of place will suffer and in 30 years the area will once again fall into neglect and disrepair.

All is not lost though as the neighborhood still has many opportunities to fill in the fabric gaps that still exist.  But post-recession, investment seems to be picking up steam again and new infill projects are constantly rising from the ground.  Therefore, the neighborhood needs to develop even better standards for urban infill projects; ones that compliment the very reason infill is happening to begin with: the existing historic fabric already in place.  My hope is that this can happen and Northern Liberties can maintain and build upon its current upswing for many years to come.

Goodbye Indianapolis – I’ll Miss You / Don’t Call Me, I’ll Call You

If you have ever read this blog and followed the ‘Walking the Walk’ series about being car-free in Indy, you know that my walking habits rarely veered away from a few key streets in Downtown.  For two years this was the life I lived, with no real desire to wander off course.  But since June of this year, all that changed when my life took a significant detour off my normal walking routes and landed me in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania where I now live.  Earlier this year, I pursued a career opportunity that I couldn’t pass up.  After a long interview process, a lot of waiting around, and traveling to and from Philadelphia I eventually landed the job I sought out.  I now work for a national planning and urban design firm in Center City, Philadelphia and am still trying to adjust to my new life and figure out the best walking routes to work (well…more like the best subway routes).  With this detour away from Indiana and the Midwest came the realization that I must say goodbye to what was my home for the past two years.  But as of now, I’m not sure how to say goodbye to Indianapolis.

I guess I have one of those ‘love-hate’ relationships with the City; so much so that I find myself torn between wanting to say “goodbye I will miss you – stay in touch” and “it’s not you, it’s me; don’t call me, I’ll call you.”  For me to sort through this ambivalence I think a thorough list of the pros and cons of Indianapolis is required.

First the pros.  I love Indianapolis because ultimately, the City will always be my city of firsts: my first big job out of school, my first apartment all to my self, my first car-free lifestyle experience, my first blog about urbanism, etc.  These coming-of-age ‘firsts’ allowed me to become a stronger individual and develop a truer personal identity.  So thank you Indianapolis for being the platform for these important ‘firsts’ in my young adult life, I truly appreciate it.

As these amorous feelings begin to make me feel all warm and fuzzy inside, I am quickly reminded of the dichotomous relationship I have with the Circle City and begin to think that maybe it’s a better idea to coldly text “goodbye” from my East Coast digs and never look back – simple and swift.

Now the cons.  As an urban planner and designer and a self-proclaimed progressive in the field, I found Indianapolis frustrating, sometimes excruciatingly so.  Among my like-minded peers, these sentiments are typical in mid-sized, newer Midwest cities like Columbus, Kansas City, and Des Moines where there is an urban legacy shortage on amenities such as a strong public transit system, high quality urban designs, and high residential densities.  Therefore, there seems to be little dialogue on improving such amenities because, without a point of past reference, things are all-too-often seen as ‘fine as is’.  And when there actually is a fair amount of dialogue, it is often met with strong resistance and bickering, eventually resulting in a product or improvement that is heavily watered down.  Yes, it is fair to say I am thus far enjoying living in Philadelphia where these amenities are the rule not the exception.

So ok, I know I just seriously ragged on Indianapolis for the better part of the last paragraph.  But upon further reflection regarding this issue of frustration and malaise with regard to urban planning progressivity in the City, I can’t help but also think that this downside, with all its implied shortcomings, is also what makes Indianapolis very intriguing.  Given the size of Indianapolis, what better place to stand up, actually be heard, and make a difference on progressive urban issues?  Whereas it seems rather easy to get lost in the shuffle in bigger cities like Philadelphia or New York, the progressive urbanist community in Indianapolis is smaller, providing an excellent arena to sharpen your point-of-view and make a difference on these issues moving forward.  On top of this, the City provides a relative ‘blank canvas’ to work with, allowing progress to happen more quickly as opposed to other cities like Cincinnati and Cleveland where legacy costs and larger bureaucracies are more of an issue.

Ok, reflection time is over, for now anyway.  In the end, I suppose the aforementioned cons of Indianapolis have, by the end of my reflection, turned into yet another pro for the City and why I see so much potential there.  So it looks like my relationship with Indy won’t end via any awkward texts; no short emails; no uncomfortable phone calls.  Instead, I’ll simply say “I’ll see you later.”  I hope the City feels the same.


Follow me on Twitter (@GMeckstroth)

Blog Categories

The Archives

streetsblog.net

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.